So, today is a big news day. No, not because of the US presidential elections. The really big news today is that Canon have released a new lens cap design! Well, both Canon and Nikon actually announced new products which I will discuss, but I find the new lens caps the most interesting as they are the only new product that I personally would want.
Centre-pinch lenses caps
I have a number of Canon lenses, but I also have Sigma lenses, which use a design similar to the one shown above. I have always struggled to get Canon caps on and get them to stay on, because of their side-pinch release mechanism. If you knock the clip on one side, which you inevitably do when putting a camera into a bag or even down on a hard surface, then the thing pops off, exposing the front element or causing potential loss of the cap. The Sigma centre-pinch caps I have seem much more secure and also enable putting them on or taking them off with a lens hood in place, which to me is the most important benefit. I believe Nikon and others, like Tamron, have also seen the logic of this method, so I don’t know why it took so long for Canon to come around.
The new design will be rolled out with all new Canon lenses in the EF range from January 2013. You will also be able to buy them for your old lenses, probably at around $10 (or £/€, take your pick) as you can already for the EF-M 52mm diameter EOS-M lenses. They will be available in 58, 67, 72, 77 and 82mm diameters.
What else is new:
Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM
Having pissed a lot of people off by releasing a mark II version of the EF 24-70mm f/2.8L without IS but with a huge price ($2,300/£2000) earlier in the year, Canon have now decided to rub salt in the wounds by announcing a lens in this focal length range with image stabilisation, in the form of a new EF 24-70mm f/4L IS. Not only that, but the new lens has a fancy version of IS, called hybrid IS (H-IS), previously only found on the 100mm f/2.8L Macro, which corrects for motion caused by angular and shift movement (i.e corrects for forward and backward movement), rather than just angular shake. However, as has become Canon’s mantra, these improvements demand an high price, $1500 in fact. This seems an excessive price to pay for quite a slow zoom, especially when the existing EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM is longer, cheaper, has IS and is a very solid performer.
The new Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM. Image from Canon USA
However, the new lens could be interesting in some respects. The new IS, for example, will help compensate for the slow aperture when taking non-action shots. Furthermore, the lens has a very close minimum focusing distance of 0.2m, giving a maximum magnification of 0.7x; that’s near 1:1 macro capability! Add that to the H-IS and you have a high quality, light, compact ‘walk around’ lens that can also essentially save you from having buying a dedicated macro lens.
The 24-70mm zoom range is also commonly used by wedding photographers, and the macro capabilities of this new lens could allow them to get great detail shots (rings etc.) without having to carry and change to a dedicated lens. Although I think most wedding photographers would chose the f/2.8 to freeze motion, this may not necessarily be required with the 4-stop benefit of H-IS and the high iso capabilities of the current generation of DSLRs. It does raise the question though, why didn’t they add IS to the f/2.8? The new lens appears to neatly fill a void left in the price range by the discontinuation of the 24-70mm f/2.8L USM I.
MTF for wide end of the 24-70mm f/4L.
MTF for the tele end of the 24-70mm f/4L.
The MTF charts suggest the 24-70mm f/4L will have decent performance, particularly at the tele end, but will it beat the 24-105mm f/4L and, if so, by enough to justify its price.
The lens is due for release in mid-December, just in time for you to spend you Christmas dollars on it!
Canon EF 24-70mm f/4L IS USM specs:
- 15 elements in 12 groups, with two aspherical lens and 2 UD lens for correction of aberrations
- 9-blade circular aperture for smooth bokeh and round OoF highlights
- Weatherproof (not sure what this means, is it full sealed or just drizzle-resistant? I would guess the latter)
- Quiet and fast ultrasonic autofocus motor with full-time manual focus and inner focusing system (lens only extends when zooming)
- Macro mode at 70mm giving 0.2m min. focusing distance (stated as 0.38m on the canon USA page), 0.7x the max. magnification
- Hybrid IS (complementing macro capabilities)
- 77mm filter size
- Around 600g with relatively compact dimensions (93mm x 83.4mm)
Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM
Canon also announced a soon to be available (December 2012 if all goes well) replacement for the ancient 35mm f/2 prime lens. The new lens, the EF 35mm f/2 IS USM will feature IS (not of the hybrid variety) and has an ultrasonic motor.
EF 35mm f/2 IS USM specs:
- 10 elements in 8 groups, with a glass-molded aspherical lens
- 8-blade circular aperture
- 4 stop IS
- AF motor ring USM, with full-time manual focus
- 67mm filter size
- 335g , 62.6mm x 77.9mm
- MFD of 0.24m
The new lens looks much nicer then the old one, which was cheap and plastic looking. Nevertheless, people liked the old version, though it has a poor autofocus system and terrible bokeh due to its 5-blade non-circular aperture. The latter issue should hopefully be address by the inclusion of an 8-blade circular aperture on the new version, and the former will definitely be fixed with the USM.
I personally don’t see the benefit of IS on this focal length, which is easy to handhold, particular when you can bump up the iso nowadays. However, IS is supposed to be of benefit for video, and Canon seems keen on video at the moment.
MTF chart for the old EF 35mm f/2.
MTF for the new EF 35mm f/2 IS USM.
Looking at the MTF charts for both the 35mm f/2 lenses, the new lens does seem perform better, as should be expected.
The biggest problem with this lens for me, is again the price! Canon want $850, and probably close to £750 in the UK, for a f/2 non-L lens, which replaces a lens that you can get for under $310 or £210. To further put that into context, I picked up a 35mm f/1.4L, which has to be a better lens, for £1000 new a long while ago now. I know the new lens has IS and USM and is better built than the previous 35 mm f/2 and that the retail price might come down quickly (though Canon has implemented a minimum advertised price policy, which might prevent this); however, this is progress that should be expected at little extra cost upon release, in my opinion. My new TV is razor-thin, has free digital channels, and many other features, but was priced cheaper than my old cathode-ray beast. Whether such a price increase is justified will depend on your needs and the results the lens gives. If it gives the f/1.4L version a run for its money at shared apertures then it might be justified, particularly if you like IS and video, but I for one am not interested.
The 35mm f/2 was one of those old lenses, like the 50mm f/1.8 II, which has flaws, but offered excellent bang for your buck and offered a low cost entry into the world of fast primes. As far as I can tell, Canon is shutting the door on relatively inexperience enthusiasts or those on a budget by removing fast primes from the 100-300 dollar/pound price range. Hell, even the new 24mm and 28mm IS primes are only f/2.8 and cost well over double this amount. Nikon, on the otherhand, seems to be expanding their range of low cost fast primes for full frame and crop sensor cameras. Nikon are also releasing very strong amateur/budget bodies, like the D5200 announced today and the D600 (and which I will blog about tomorrow) that appear to kill the Canon 650D/60D and 6D, respectively. I hope this approach causes a shift in allegiance of new photographers to Nikon, so that pressure is placed on Canon to start being more competitive and innovative. But we shall see….